IWB (Interactive White Boards) is the generic name for SMARTBoards as they are commonly called in schools. I’ve had a number of queries from teachers recently about the pros and cons of each platform so I thought I’d be efficient by posting on my blog and sending along the link.
Disclaimer – these are my personal views and don’t represent the official view of our district. Also, most importantly, I have no financial motivation for supporting either platform.
SMARTBoards
A fast growing Canadian company based in Calgary. They have been around for years as have many of their original boards as longevity of the hardware doesn’t seem to be an issue. A whole ecosystem has developed around their tools. There is certification as a SMARTBoard trainer and resources on their SMART Exchange website are outstanding. In addition, most major Canadian publishers including Nelson, McGraw-Hill and recently Scholastic, make their digital resources available as SMARTNotebook files. These publisher resources already have the interactive elements that would take hours for teachers to create on their own. Their licensing allows for both teachers and student to install the software at home. We have many teachers who assign homework to students to create a lesson in notebook that they then demonstrate to the class later. See previous blog post about SMARTNotebook.
In addition, google search will let you search for SMARTNotebook files. Just put the extension ‘filetype:notebook’ into your search. Here is an example of a search for notebook files with the word ‘science’ on the page.
| Pro | Con |
|
|
Mimio
According to the website, they have been around since 1997 and were invented at MIT. My experience with them is much more limited as I’ve only heard about them for about a year now.
We now have a few schools with Mimeo devices and more considering them all the time. The are ‘instantly’ mounted on any pre-existing whiteboard. A word of caution, if you use with an older 4:3 ratio LCD projector, the image size is quite small. Be sure to consider a newer wide screen projector like the NP510W from NEC that we use in our district. This will give a large working space.
Mimio also has a sharing site called MimioConnect with lesson plans, forums and support.
| Pro | Con |
|
|
Summary
In reflecting on this posting, I realize that it looks like there is a clear preference towards the SMART product but here are some factors that will change the balance over time:
- If more educators select the Mimeo due to the cheaper price, there will be a growing critical mass of educators posting and sharing mimeo files
- A file converter that converts a SMARTNotebook file to a Mimeo file.
Please comment and share your pros/cons and experiences with your IWB.
Facebook/James McConville
Linkedin/jamesmcconville
Twitter/jmcconville1000
YouTube/jmcconville1000
Del.icio.us/jmcconville
GMail/James McConville
Blog/James McConville
8 comments:
Hi James, Any experience with the EPSON product? I'm considering the BrightLink for the same reasons you seem to have been interested in the Mimeo product.
Hi James
Just sat through a Smartboard demo today. Forget the hardware. I was really impressed by the capability of the Notebook software. The things it could do, quickly and easily were amazing.
Hi Marc,
Sorry, other than a brief view of the EPSON product at the CUEBC conference I don't have any information. If it is cheaper, my thought would be that SMART Notebook would still be the trump card.
Hi John,
Yes, the software is quite amazing especially in the hands of an educator who knows how to make the most of it.
Spent some time with Mimeo at ISTE last July. Great product, would be a good fit for schools. Maybe not quite a mature as SMART, but it may catch up as James states, when more teachers get on board.
You forgot to mention the Mimeo is easy to install to the white board but can easily move and knock the calibration out, this will not not happen with a SMARTBoard. Also you have to consider that the SMARTBorad is much more intuitive to use as you can interact with your PC with your finger, pick up a pen and draw. Mimeo is cheaper but over the life of the product I would argue that a SMARTBoard is much better value.
Despite the bulk of information online we often fail to get the specific information which is needed this post is good & contains relevant information that I was in quest of .I appreciate your efforts in preparing this post.
Free dissertation titles
The big draw for my team was the price of a Mimio - $800 with shipping and handling as opposed to the $2400 we spent on one SmartBoard. We were able to get technology into three classrooms as opposed to one. As well, it is incredibly compact and you get to keep your whiteboard. As for the calibration, it is far more stable than a SmartBoard that isn't mounted. No, the software isn't as advanced as SmartBoard, but it is getting better. A new version for Mimio software came out in September, as did other bells and whistles (such as the student hand held vote devices). Mimio also offers free live tutorials. I participated in six over the summer and they were very informative. Finally, using the Mimio pen is far more precise than using your finger or the pens that come with a SmartBoard. Having become familiar with both products, Mimio has my vote.
Thanks Julie - you have given teachers a few more things to think about. It is good to hear the Mimio software is improving.
Post a Comment